Anyone a member of Unison?

It's the union that's recognised at work, and there's part of me that's tempted to join although not for any benefits there. It's a sufficiently small organisation that we don't actually need it. But there are other benefits.

And of course, Unison has a Lesbian and Gay Campaign. But when they say 'Lesbian and Gay' they mean Lesbian and Gay.

To give you an idea of just how biphobic the L&G campaign is, when they're reporting on who attended something they break it down into age, racial identity, earnings etc and gender. That's as in "12 lesbians 10 gay men" gender.

It was women from Unison's L&G campaign who drove several other women to tears when they insisted at an ILGA (International Lesbian & Gay Association – to change the name needs a constitutional amendment which needs almost 100% support) meeting that women's caucus meant, necessarily, a lesbian-only one.

Now, I have the sense of humour that means I can laugh at this sort of crap – not least because they just hate that – but tempting as it is to join the L&G campaign and kick up a fuss… it would be good to have a Unison Bisexual Campaign.

I suspect that would need more than one person though 🙂 (Mind you, the L&G campaign doesn't seem to have that many activists.)

Edit: gosh, how they changed over the next few years.

Diamonds are for-what?

One of the things I love about Makro (a cash and carry) are their offers on jewelry and what they say about the jewelry industry.

9ct Gold Diamond Ring £49.99 [plus VAT]

Valuation certificate supplied at the full retail value £249.00

Hmm, would you believe such a certificate?

I used to have a personal account with them

As a condition of having a mortgage with them, work have switched the current account to another bank.

Lloyds, who the accounts were with, managed to delay this for weeks. Then – without telling us it was going to happen – they take out all the money, transfer it to the new bank, then complain that the current account went overdrawn. (Odd that.)

They then took all the money back. For a day. Then transfered it out again, and closed the account. Oh, and they charged us for those last two transfers.

Now, when the Inland Revenue wrongly submitted their direct debit to them, rather than the new bank, they went "Gosh, that account doesn't exist any more. I know, we'll just take the money out of this other account of theirs. We won't bother asking them, we'll just complain that it's gone overdrawn and try to bounce this other cheque on it…"

In-fucking-credible.

I was so glad when we were one of the 90% they told to find another phone company

It has taken me two weeks of calling to get any figures for the phone tarrif work are supposed to be on with Cable & Wireless.

Today, I have been definitively told the prices we're meant to be paying. Hooray.

Unfortunately, I have been told two different prices by two different people, but they both assure me that they are right.

Unfortunately, again, what we are actually being charged according to the bills is rather more expensive than either of them.

It does not help that one of the droids reckons that we've been switched from one tarrif to another without anyone telling a) the billing people and b) us.

Or that the other one could talk happily about prices for direct and indirect local calls, but when asked what these actually are said, "Well, a direct call is when you call a customer directly and an indirect call is erm, well, erm, I'll get back to you on that one."

An indirect call is not, apparently, an 0845 call. For which we should be charged 2.4p+VAT a minute. No, 2.5p+VAT. "So why is a 59 second call billed to us at 3.2p+VAT and a 58 second one at 3.1p+VAT?" "Erm, well, erm, I'll get back to you on that one."

BT might be – might be?!? are! – greedy scum with a predeliction for confusion pricing (e.g. having deliberately having so many tarrifs, it's difficult to see which is the best for you, or concealling what it is you're being charged for by combining several items into one line of the bill – it turned out we were paying over £16+VAT a quarter to hire a crappy answerphone!) but at least they do publish a definitive price list on their website. Mind you, it's not the most friendly format in the world, if you want to download the lot, but it is there.

C&W's site doesn't know anything about either tarrif we're said to be on. Anywhere. Prices for anything? Ha.

I'm waiting for a reason as to why we should stay with them.

Noun

Discovered today: Microsoft Word's dictionary has never heard of the word 'fluffer' (a person who ensures male actors in porn films have erections, usu by means of oral sex.)

Someone talking about a '81 album reminds me

P2P networks have given me the opportunity to get listenable copies of most of my old vinyl LPs and, in some cases, see what else they've done.

I've all the Rick Wakeman albums from the early/mid 70s (Arthur is particularly good, even 27 years on) and wondered how many other's he's done.

Since 1981, Kraftwerk have released let's call it one and a half albums of new stuff.

Since 1981, he's done ninety.

A few days after she was one

JA sat though, entranced, the entire Ring cycle this afternoon. Admittedly it was the Les Grooms 90 minute version – after five minutes they say "we're now forty minutes in" and keep track like that until with about a quarter of a hour until the end "there's still four hours to go!".

But the queue of people to tell me how impressed they were with her was longer than the queue of people congratulating the performers (and they were very good!) The way she blew little raspberries when someone was playing the digiridoo probably helped 🙂

There was one point at which she wriggled a lot and I though 'Oh no, I'll have to take her out'. But it turned out to be that the action had moved just out of her sight and moving her slightly so she could see had her happy again.

In my day, we had it tough

Last week, Chancellor of the Exchequer (the one in charge of the government's money) Gordon Brown made a speech which included this:

Too often there are workers without jobs side by side with jobs without workers [hang on, didn't Norman Tebbit use that phrase?] Tottenham, for example, has 3,500 men, 4,800 adults, unemployed while neighbouring districts have seen over sixty thousand vacancies in the last six months, with many more in the wider London economy.

Labour shortages exist today in large numbers in retail, hotels and restaurants, transport and communications and in every region.

To match the unemployed to vacancies we have introduced intensive area-based initiatives in difficult areas: fifteen employment zones 63 action teams Which have helped nearly seventy thousand people into jobs so far.

And building on this, we are piloting the step up scheme in fourteen areas, with another six starting in December — obliging the long-term unemployed to accept a guaranteed job which will offer, instead of the dole, secure waged employment. In London and selected cities, we are matching this new regime with mandatory work preparation courses for the long-term unemployed.

Some years ago, he and Tony Blair made a deal that Tony would support Gordon for the leadership when the time came. Blair ratted on that, and now Brown – the man without the job he was promised – is taking it out on the jobless.

Because he is a man with a job that, while very well paid, will pale into nothing compared to the seven figure salaries for part-time work that will be offered him the second he retires.

And he's saying that he's about to force other people to take whatever McJob someone is prepared to make available through a Job Centre. [Which have recently been rebranded, at huge public cost, as… wait for it… Job Centre Plus]

Has he, I wonder, examined just what those vacancies are and why they're not being filled?

'Waged'? Is it a coincidence that the jobs he mentions – retail, hotels and restaurants, transport and communications i.e. call centres – are the crappiest, lowest paid ones going? Is there the slightest doubt in anyone's mind why there are vacancies there, particularly in London?

When I got this job, I noted that it paid two and half times what an exactly equivalent one advertised that week at the JC did. Fuck off. Never mind being able to buy somewhere on that, you'd need Housing Benefit in order to rent.

Or the series of DTP jobs I also asked about then. 'Blah, blah, blah…' fine, I can do that '… needs fluent Arabic [or Urdu or…]'. Ah. Coo, I wonder why they're unfilled after three months…

A few months back, they introduced some terminals which enable you to search anywhere in the UK for jobs in the JC database. Extending the search to everywhere within the M25 (the motorway around London) I would typically find just three to five jobs I could plausibly go for. And he wants to be able to force people to accept anything.

'Secure' jobs? Well, the people forced into them won't be able to leave without losing benefits for months.

Someone do a 'Back to the Floor' on him, please, and get him to take anything he's offered and see how he does.

Oh, those work preparation courses? Don't make me laugh. Because they changed the name of the scheme – clearly people had caught on with the previous name – about eighteen months ago, I agreed to a month or so of one of these. What a fucking waste of time.

The course had been contracted out and of couse the lowest bid had won the contract. Unfortunately, that didn't leave any money for any, you know, content. By arranging to sit in the right seat with the ancient PCs, I worked on my MCSE – Minesweeper Consultant and Solitare Expert – skills and my Warlords scores were polished, but that's about it.

As far as job search went, they didn't even have the money to get more than one newspaper plus some free sheets. They used to beg us to bring in some other publications. "Internet jobsites are free to search…" "Yes, but we're not allowed to have access to the internet."

It's almost tempting to start a company to exploit this shit.